A bank the size of Citi produces an enormous amount of high-stakes visual work: board and investor presentations, credit card design, global event environments, product interfaces, brand and print. Almost none of it was made inside the bank. It went out to agencies at agency rates on agency timelines, and nobody internally owned the quality of what came back.
Management had seen what I could produce on my own. I proposed we stop renting the capability and build it.
In-house creative has a credibility problem, and it's a fair one. Internal teams get treated as production: the place work goes when the budget's already spent, staffed by people executing someone else's thinking. Hiring designers was never the hard part. The hard part was making an internal studio the first call instead of the last resort, on work where a bad slide in front of the board or a mis-set credit card carries real consequences.
Three people. That was the studio.
Credit cards, investor and executive decks, mobile and web, brand, print, motion, illustration, executive headshots, event photography, and global event environments down to the signage, stickers, and apparel. Everything below is ours. I hired the team, set the quality bar, and stayed in the work myself the entire time.
At three people, systems aren't an optimization. They're the only way the math works. We built the templates, component libraries, and asset libraries that let every request start from something instead of from zero, which is also what kept the work consistent across touchpoints without making it generic. And in an environment this regulated, we partnered daily with legal, compliance, brand, and product to move work through review without letting it get flattened on the way. Constraints weren't the obstacle to the idea. They were usually the brief.
We delivered at half the cost and half the time of outside vendors, benchmarked against actual vendor quotes on the same work. I ran the studio for almost a decade. That ratio is the entire argument for an in-house team, and it's an argument you have to keep winning, because the moment quality slips someone starts pricing agencies again. In 2023 I brought an AI-native production pipeline into the workflow, two years ahead of adoption elsewhere in the bank, and cut our timelines and budget in half again.
What I took from it: the team is the deliverable. Three people covered what the bank had been paying agencies to cover, and the reason wasn't heroics. It was hiring carefully, setting the bar honestly, and building systems that made the hundredth request cheaper than the first.